mercredi 14 février 2018

Are we in a kind of stealth planned economy at world level?

When we see that all big companies are controlled by Illuminati/Jewish leaders, the question of the planning of the economy comes to the mind.

Indeed, all big companies are under the power of the "Dynasty". Just look at all the illuminati logos, the chairmen's origin, the links between those companies, etc…

All political leaders of all the governments are also members of this Dynasty.

Then, if all the main companies, all the major economic sectors and all the countries are in the hands of Illuminati/Jewish leaders, it means that everything that happens in the economic field is planned by them. So, we are in some sort of communist state at world level. In communist countries, all economics events were decided by the elite. And it is the same thing here.

The difference here is that: 1) all of this is hidden; 2) salaries are not equal. So, we are more in a sort of stealth planned economy at world level.

It means that all the deaths of big societies are phony. For example, the nearly death of Nokia was certainly planned by Illuminati/Jewish leaders.

Same thing for the slow or fast ascension of new big companies. They are all planned by Illuminati/Jewish leaders. For example, the rise of computer companies like Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Google, Dell, HP, Samsung, Sony, etc, was planned from the beginning. But the elite makes you think that the creation of those companies just comes from brilliant guys who created their company in a garage or who had an incredibly strong will. Of course, those guys are members of the Illuminati/Jewish dynasty put there in order to make dream ordinary people.

When a company makes "errors", it is because it was decided that way. And when it creates a great product and not its competitors, it's the same thing.

And we can think that Illuminati/Jewish leaders create artificial movements in the economic field often just to maintain the illusion that we really are in a free economy. It can be also for economic or political purposes. But, often, it's just to create this illusion of movements.

So, when you company is sold to another one or is merged with another one, this is not for the reason they tell you but frequently to maintain this illusion.

The creation of new big societies and the death of ancient ones are done in order to create this illusion of movement. And occasionally, they don't even bother to kill or create a company; they just change its name, and it's enough to make people forget about the ancient one.

Sometime, they also need to adapt the market to new situations. So, they can kill some firms in order to make prices increase. It means that there are also economic motivations behind that. But it's always decided by the Dynasty.

If there weren't so many economic events and movements, people would finally understand that we don't really live in a free economy, but in a planned one controlled by just few people. Then, their motivation to work would collapse.

They would cease to believe in the international economic war. They would know that when the economy of a country is favored or not, it isn't mainly because their natives are bad or good workers, but because the Illuminati/Jewish leaders have just decided it to be this way. They wouldn't believe anymore in the competition between society X vs. society Y or Z.

And of course, they would finally begin to protest against this masquerade.

Regarding small companies, I think it's different. A lot of them are not owned by the Elite, but by ordinary people (maybe 80 %). It's like in Russia during the communist era. Farmers were able to sell a small amount of food for their own profit. This allows motivating people to work. But if one firm reaches a certain size, the Elite will take it over (either by buying it, controlling it or killing it).

About medium-sized enterprises, it is probably balanced. If the size of the company is not too big, and if the economic sector is not economically of politically strategic for the Illuminatis, they will probably let it be owned by an ordinary guy. If it isn't the case, they will take it over. But if the sector is important for them, most of the time, they will have created the company themselves.

However, many small and medium companies are owned by people indirectly controlled of the Illuminatis, like ordinary Jews. Because of the importance of the group in the Jewish culture, Jewish people are strongly tied to their community. So, they will comply with orders coming from the Elite.

Some of them are also controlled by ordinary people who, because of their economic success, have been introduced to freemasonry and have become middle level Freemasons. Those people are not part of the elite and its conspiracy. But as they have benefited of helps from freemasonry, and have sworn fidelity to it, they are forced to obey to injunctions from high level freemasons. Or else, they know there will be retaliations. So, they become puppets of the Elite.

So, regarding the part of medium companies owned by ordinary guys, maybe 30 % of them are. The rest is directly or indirectly controlled by the Illuminatis/Jewish leaders.

But, regarding medium companies, even if an ordinary guy owns one, the Illuminatis will easily control it. For example, many firms are just subcontractors for big companies. So, very often, they are controlled by big companies which can force them to accept low prices in order to still work with them.

In the conspirationist sphere, agents working for the Elite don't want you to understand that. So, even if they tell you that big firms are controlled by the Illuminatis, they will make you think that there are still fights between members of the Elite and that it's why you have all those events and movements in the big companies' domain. For example, they will make you think that there is a battle between Illuminatis from China or Russia and those from the USA. Or they will tell you that some economic interests have pushed this or that faction of the Elite to take control of some sector of the economic field or of such company. But it's false.

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire